Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
01 November 2013
What Good Did the Vote Ever Do Anyone?
It struck Tietjens that the young woman was a good deal more interested in the cause--of votes for women--than he had given her credit for. He wasn't much in the mood for talking to young women, but it was with considerably more than the surface of his mind that he answered:
'I don't. I approve entirely of your methods: but your aims are idiotic.'
She said:
'You don't know, I suppose, that Gertie Wilson, who's in bed at our house, is wanted by the police: not only for yesterday, but for putting explosives in a whole series of letter-boxes?'
He said:
'I didn't...but it was a perfectly proper thing to do. She hasn't burned any of my letters or I might be annoyed; but it wouldn't interfere with my approval.'
'You don't think,' she asked earnestly, 'that we...mother and I...are likely to get heavy sentences for shielding her? It would be beastly bad luck on mother. Because she's an anti...'
'I don't know about the sentence,' Tietjens said, 'but we'd better get her off your premises as soon as we can...'
She said:
'Oh, you'll help?'
He answered:
'Of course, your mother can't be incommoded. She's written the only novel that's been fit to read since the eighteenth century.'
She stopped and said earnestly:
'Look here. Don't be one of those ignoble triflers who say the vote won't do women any good. Women have a rotten time. They do, really. If you'd seen what I've seen, I'm not talking through my hat.' Her voice became quite deep: she had tears in her eyes: 'Poor women do!' she said, 'little insignificant creatures. We've got to change the divorce laws. We've got to get better conditions. You couldn't stand it if you knew what I know.'
Her emotion vexed him, for it seemed to establish a sort of fraternal intimacy that he didn't at the moment want. Women do not show emotion except before their families. He said drily:
'I daresay I shouldn't. But I don't know, so I can!' She said with deep disappointment:
'Oh, you are a beast! And I shall never beg your pardon for saying that. I don't believe you mean what you say, but merely to say it is heartless.'
This was another of the counts of Sylvia's indictment and Tietjens winced again. She explained:
'You don't know the case of the Pimlico army clothing factory workers or you wouldn't say the vote would be no use to women.'
'I know the case perfectly well,' Tietjens said: 'It came under my official notice, and I remember thinking that there never was a more signal instance of the uselessness of the vote to anyone.'
'We can't be thinking of the same case,' she said.
'We are,' he answered. 'The Pimlico army clothing factory is in the constituency of Westminster; the Under-Secretary for War is member for Westminster; his majority at the last election was six hundred. The clothing factory employed seven hundred men at 1s. 6d. an hour, all these men having votes in Westminster. The seven hundred men wrote to the Under-Secretary to say that if their screw wasn't raised to two bob they'd vote solid against him at the next election...'
Miss Wannop said: 'Well then!'
'So,' Tietjens said: 'The Under-Secretary had the seven hundred men at eighteenpence fired and took on seven hundred women at tenpence. What good did the vote do the seven hundred men? What good did a vote ever do anyone?'
Miss Wannop checked at that and Tietjens prevented her exposure of his fallacy by saying quickly:
'Now, if the seven hundred women, backed by all the other ill-used, sweated women of the country, had threatened the Under-Secretary, burned the pillar-boxes, and cut up all the golf greens round his country house, they'd have had their wages raised to half a crown next week. That's the only straight method. It's the feudal system at work.'
'Oh, but we couldn't cut up golf greens,' Miss Wannop said. 'At least the W.S.P.U. debated it the other day, and decided that anything so unsporting would make us too unpopular. I was for it personally.'
Tietjens groaned:
'It's maddening,' he said, 'to find women, as soon as they get in Council, as muddleheaded and as afraid to face straight issues as men!...'
--Ford Madox Ford, Some Do Not, Book I of the tetralogy Parade's End (or "The Tietjens Novels").
Labels:
ford madox ford,
parade's end,
Politics,
some do not,
suffrage,
Voting,
women's rights
08 August 2013
The Custom House--Force and Guile in Samson Agonistes
Bringing Down the House: Force and Guile in Milton's Samson Agonistes (Extended Conversation w/Penelope Anderson)
August 3, 2013
75:53 minutes (69.48 MB)
Radio Cut (31:34 m)
On this episode of The Custom House we'll investigate the claims of Milton's Samson as he argues his holy dispensation as a divine right to be violent and deceitful in marriage as in war.
In this episode of The Custom House we turn to 17th century English poet John Milton for an assessment of love and marriage, or perhaps of lust and betrayal as presented in his play Samson Agonistes published in 1671. On hand to assist us in this is Penelope Anderson an assistant professor in the English Department here at Indiana University whose research aims to show the longstanding historical intersections between the legal and conceptual frameworks of political prisoner, slave, and subjected woman, in order to reveal a new genealogy of human rights articulated in their suspension.
This extended cut includes two more readings of the text. One is a back-and-forth between Samson and Dalila, lines 732-996; the other comprises lines 1629-1659 where a messenger describes Samson pulling down the pillars supporting the “theatre” (in Milton’s word; the biblical word is “house”).
Labels:
indiana university,
john milton,
judges,
law,
marriage,
penelope anderson,
Politics,
samson,
samson agonistes,
the custom house
18 January 2011
Politics Becoming Religious
I'm sure this is no surprise to you. I'm fairly convinced that though nearly 400 years have passed since the real founding of America (not the United States thereof) we have really not come very far from our "origins".
In any event, a kind of placeholder thought from Soren K. in his Journals:
In any event, a kind of placeholder thought from Soren K. in his Journals:
Even now, in 1848, it certainly looks as though politics were everything; but it will be seen that the catastrophe (the Revolution) corresponds to us and is the obverse of the Reformation: then everything pointed to a religious movement and proved to be political, now everything points to a political movement, but will become religious.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)